Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Murder on the Lockhart Road

It is difficult to understand that David Camm was convicted beyond reasonable doubts in the death of his wife and children. There are so much physical evidence against Boney, but there is not much against him. Conspiracy theory is kind of ridiculous. There is no evidence that supports that. There has to be some kind of phone calls or witness if they know each other. To me, whole case remains pretty much unsolved except the part that Boney was involved. I think he lied about conspiracy because he knew he could not get away (due to lots of physical evidence) but wanted to receive lesser charge by blaming it on Camm. If David Camm conspired with Boney, he will purposely get air tight alibi rather than church's basketball and he would not be there. What is the point of hiring someone if he has to be there? If prosecutors think that blood stained T-shirt was evidence, it really does not make any sense of their claim that Camm committed murder between the basketball games. Everyone will notice the blood if he went back with that shirt. I really believe those 10 people who says David Camm was there at church and never left. I think that is such absurd theory that they did not notice he left. If anyone were to commit a crime by hiring someone, he won't depend on witness that might say "Yes, we noticed David left for about 15 to 20 minutes during the basketball game" There is always someone who notices things more than the other. They could be the witness to him who claim he left the game. So, there is no way that David could rely on them as a witness. Those situations are beyond his control, and I believe that he did not leave as they said. Basically prosecutors saying 10 people did not notice he left and they also did not notice any blood. This is absurd. I am sure of Boney's involvement, but need a lot more evidence to convict David. I still don't see the clear motive as well. He deserves 3rd trial.

No comments:

Post a Comment